living standards · a british resilience index analysis
Where hardship stacks up in England
Hardship is not one thing or one place. This British Resilience Index analysis ranks every lower tier local authority in England on three official measures at once: the fuel poverty rate, the share of children in low income after housing costs, and the drug misuse death rate. Combining them shows where the deepest hardship overlaps, and how the places with the highest child poverty on paper are often not the places carrying the heaviest combined load.
How to read this
We take three separately sourced official indicators, rank the 296 local authorities on each from least to most affected, and average the ranks into a hardship index from 0 to 100. A higher score means an area sits high on more of the three measures at once. This is a British Resilience Index analysis, not an official statistic; each input is cited and reconciled to its publisher.
Composite computed by the British Resilience Index from DESNZ fuel poverty (2024), DWP and HMRC children in low income after housing costs (FYE 2025), and ONS drug misuse deaths (2022 to 2024). England, 296 lower tier local authorities.
The combined picture
The deepest hardship is in the old industrial North and the coast
On the combined index, Blackpool, a coastal town, carries the heaviest hardship in England, sitting near the top on all three measures at once. Behind it come the big cities of the North and Midlands: Birmingham, Kingston upon Hull, City of, Manchester and Liverpool. These are places where expensive to heat homes, low incomes and drug harm pile up together, rather than appearing one at a time.
The hardship index
The twelve highest combined hardship areas
Each area's score is its average rank across the three measures, from 0 to 100. The table below it shows how each place stands on the underlying figures: the fuel poverty rate, the children in low income rate, and the drug misuse death rate per 100,000.
fuel 13.9% · low income 39.2% · drug deaths 21.3 per 100k
fuel 13.8% · low income 44.4% · drug deaths 10 per 100k
fuel 13.5% · low income 37.2% · drug deaths 10.1 per 100k
fuel 12% · low income 42.3% · drug deaths 10.4 per 100k
fuel 11.9% · low income 34.2% · drug deaths 13.9 per 100k
fuel 12.2% · low income 41.8% · drug deaths 9.3 per 100k
fuel 12.1% · low income 34.7% · drug deaths 10.5 per 100k
fuel 13.5% · low income 37.8% · drug deaths 8.5 per 100k
fuel 12.3% · low income 32.6% · drug deaths 10.3 per 100k
fuel 12.9% · low income 40.2% · drug deaths 7.8 per 100k
fuel 12.1% · low income 32.2% · drug deaths 10.5 per 100k
fuel 13.3% · low income 39.9% · drug deaths 7.6 per 100k
Index range across all 296 areas runs down to the lowest hardship: Wokingham, Hart and Surrey Heath in the prosperous South East.
Hardship is not one place
Why the child poverty map and the hardship map differ
The single highest child poverty rate in England is in Tower Hamlets at 50.3 per cent after housing costs, an inner London figure driven by some of the highest housing costs in the country. Yet Tower Hamlets ranks only 161st on the combined hardship index, because its fuel poverty and drug death rates are well below the worst. The places that top the combined index instead carry every hardship at once. Fuel poverty and child poverty move together across areas (a correlation of 0.61), but drug deaths follow a more separate geography, so combining the three surfaces a different map from any one measure alone.
Blackpool
Highest combined hardship, and highest drug death rate
Fuel poverty 13.9 per cent, children in low income 39.2 per cent, drug misuse deaths 21.3 per 100,000. Every hardship at once.
Tower Hamlets
Highest child poverty, but 161st on combined hardship
Children in low income 50.3 per cent, but fuel poverty 7.0 per cent and a low drug death rate. An income story driven by London housing costs.
Stoke-on-Trent
Highest fuel poverty rate
Fuel poverty 14.8 per cent, children in low income 37.6 per cent. Older, harder to heat housing stock.
Questions this raises
For how hardship is targeted
- The deepest combined hardship sits in the old industrial North and the coast, not in the areas with the highest headline child poverty. Does support follow the combined picture or a single measure?
- This analysis ranks areas; it does not track where support goes, so it cannot say which map funding follows. What it does show is that the two maps point at different places. Blackpool tops the combined index with a score of 98, sitting near the top on all three measures at once, while Tower Hamlets, which has the highest child poverty rate in England at 50.3 per cent after housing costs, ranks 161st of the 296 areas on the combined index because its fuel poverty rate of 7.0 per cent and its drug death rate are well below the worst. Support targeted on child poverty alone would therefore land in a different set of places from support targeted on the combined picture.
- Fuel poverty and low income track each other, but drug deaths follow a more separate map. Are these treated as one problem or three?
- The data does not describe how services or budgets are organised, so it cannot answer that directly. It does show that the three measures are not interchangeable: fuel poverty and child poverty move together across areas, with a correlation of 0.61, while drug deaths follow a more separate geography. Each measure on its own also points to a different place. Stoke-on-Trent has the highest fuel poverty rate at 14.8 per cent, Tower Hamlets the highest child poverty rate at 50.3 per cent, and Blackpool the highest drug misuse death rate at 21.3 per 100,000.
- Inner London tops child poverty largely because of housing costs. How much of that would ease if housing were cheaper rather than incomes higher?
- The page cannot put a number on it. The children in low income measure used here is taken after housing costs, and the page describes the 50.3 per cent figure for Tower Hamlets as an inner London figure driven by some of the highest housing costs in the country. This analysis does not compare it with a before housing costs figure, which is what would be needed to show how much of the gap is housing, so the data supports a direction rather than a quantity: lower housing costs would reduce the after housing costs measure, but by how much is not shown here.
- The same northern and coastal towns appear at the top of measure after measure. What would it take to change the underlying conditions there?
- That is a question the data cannot settle; it describes the pattern rather than its causes or remedies. The pattern is consistent: Blackpool, Birmingham, Kingston upon Hull, City of, Manchester and Liverpool head the combined ranking, and all twelve of the highest scoring areas have a fuel poverty rate above the England figure of 9.9 per cent and a children in low income rate above the UK figure of 26.0 per cent. The page's own reading is that these are places where expensive to heat homes, low incomes and drug harm pile up together rather than appearing one at a time, which is why it combines the three measures instead of reporting any one alone.
Sources & method
Data provenance
- Sub-regional fuel poverty data 2026 (2024 data), DESNZ ↗· Open Government Licence v3.0
- Children in Low Income Families: local area statistics, FYE 2025 (DWP and HMRC) ↗· Open Government Licence v3.0
- Deaths related to drug poisoning by local authority, England and Wales (ONS) ↗· Open Government Licence v3.0
Caveats & data notes
- This is a British Resilience Index composite, not an official statistic. It ranks areas on each of three measures and averages the ranks into an index from 0 to 100. It shows relative position, not an absolute level of hardship.
- The three inputs cover slightly different periods: fuel poverty is 2024, children in low income is the year to March 2025, and drug misuse deaths are a three year average for 2022 to 2024. Each is the latest available at local authority level.
- Drug misuse death rates are not published for 47 of the 296 areas because deaths were too few to give a reliable rate. Those areas are ranked on the two measures that are available for them.
- The drug misuse death rate is age standardised per 100,000 and averaged over three years; the fuel poverty and child poverty figures are shares of households and children. They are combined by rank, not by adding the raw numbers.
- Figures cover England only and the 296 lower tier local authorities. Fuel poverty is defined differently in the other UK nations, so this analysis is not extended to them.
- Sources: DESNZ sub-regional fuel poverty 2024; DWP and HMRC children in low income FYE 2025; ONS drug misuse deaths 2022 to 2024.
Every figure on this page traces to its official source. Share it as it stands.
Keep going
Related deep dives
How the price of a home has climbed over thirty years, how far it varies between places, and where West Lothian sits.
What share of children grow up in a low income family, by local authority and nation, how much housing costs add, and where West Lothian sits.
How many households cannot keep warm at a reasonable cost, by region and local authority, and how the measure has changed since 2010.
The monthly reading
Get the next one by email
One email a month: the national resilience score, what moved, and the newest analyses like this one, plus The Quarterly Record four times a year. Every figure traced to its official source.